Alex requested I expand on the effects of collaborative communication vs. conspiratorial communication
Collaboration creates teams of teams.
Organizations that encourage collaboration will see greater interdepartmental and interorganizational teamwork. A sense of interdependence creates a desire to involve others in on the work at hand.
Conspiracy creates lines and sides.
Information is held in silos. The grain is harvested, then stored where it simply rots.
Teams do not grow from shared experiences. They fight to steal from each other’s silos of information, recognition and reward.
Conspiracy divides individuals, centering them around lower goals and agendas.
Myopia causes conspirators to focus on self-centered goals which don’t benefit the larger organization(s). Consequentially, they do not rally followers around them because their vision is narrow, short-sighted and low on impact.
Collaboration unifies individuals around a common, higher goal.
By collaborating, individuals and teams discover common goals held across the divide. By broadening horizons, collaborators broaden their vision and hold onto the higher goals that impact the BIGGER picture. Consequentially, collaborators attract followers who desire belonging to something bigger than themselves.
Collaboration stimulates growth.
Individuals must be empowered in collaborative environments. Collaboration encourages delegation as the vision and input of direction is bigger than one person.
Conspiracy stunts growth.
Long-term, conspiracy mindsets eventually stifle growth. Conspiracies may have early growth spurts, but are midgets as adults when compared to their potential through collaboration.
Thanks for throwing down the gauntlet Alex! I hope you and others find this stimulating, and perhaps generate your own beliefs on the effects of collaboration vs. conspiracy.